|
21st June 2004 - For mobile phone users, the anytime-anywhere
freedom of being able to talk on a cell-phone has always
stopped at that moment when an airplane leaves the gate
and taxies out onto the runway. Citing safety reasons,
aviation authorities and airlines have said that mobile
phones risk interfering with airplane avionics*, and
should not be used during flight. However, there is
little evidence to prove that use of a mobile phone
on a commercial flight presents a real risk, and if
some have their way, in the next few years you may be
able to use your own mobile while in flight.
While some in the aviation community have accused mobile
phones of interfering with navigation gear and radios
on flights, to date there have been no definitive instances
in which use of a modern digital mobile phone by a passenger
outside of the pilot compartment has been linked to
a problem with an airplane's avionics. Nevertheless,
aviation authorities have adopted a "better safe
than sorry" attitude toward mobile phones and have
banned their use outright during flight.
The fears related to mobile phone use during flight
can be traced to the fact that Radio Frequency (RF)
transmissions from some devices can interfere with the
operation of other devices that also rely on over-the-air
transmissions. This is the basis of government regulation
of the airwaves, which is designed to ensure that various
users of the airwaves (TV, radio, mobile phones, for
instance) operate on different frequencies so that they
won't interfere with each other.
In some instances, some mobile phones have been shown
to interfere with avionics when used next to (within
12 inches of) the radios and navigation gear. Interference
typically includes "noise" such as popping
or hissing that a pilot may hear over the radio. Certainly
no pilot would want to hear distracting noise, particularly
while engaged in communicating with the ground or while
taking off or landing. Another fear is that RF from
a mobile phone might drown out the low power signals
that navigation gear receives from satellites, such
as GPS signals. The obvious remedy, based on available
evidence, to ensure this doesn't happen, would be for
all the personnel in the pilot's cabin to turn off their
mobile phones while in flight. Since passengers on commercial
flights are typically not able to get within a dozen
feet of the avionics, their use of mobile phones would
present no risk to the flight from that standpoint.
Mandates against using mobile phones rely on tests
conducted in the early to mid-1990s, when nearly all
mobile phones were analog-based, and transmitted at
higher power levels. Tests to determine whether modern
digital mobile phones, which transmit at fractions of
the power levels of older analog-based handsets, have
not been conducted. Never has an instance where an interfering
event in the passenger cabin related to a mobile phone
have been able to be repeated - repeatability being
one of the key tenants of the scientific process. There
has never been an instance of mobile phone-induced interference
in the passenger cabin being repeated - and repetition
is one of the key tenants of the scientific process.
Use of mobile phones on airplanes does present substantial
risks though - not to the airplanes, but to mobile phone
networks on the ground. While a mobile phone won't crash
a plane, if everyone on a plane is using a mobile, they
will crash the cell networks as they fly over them.
The problem is that cellular phone networks were never
created to perform hand-offs on 500 MPH phones. Even
worse, the capacity that each mobile phone uses in a
plane is gigantic - potentially a mobile at 30,000 feet
could be trying to contact not one or two or three cell
towers at a time, but hundreds, or even thousands. Multiply
the number of passengers in a 767 or 777 by the hundreds
of airplanes in the air at any one time and the potential
for catastrophic interruptions of the cell networks
is huge.
As former FCC Chief of Engineering and Technology Dale
Hatfield said when informed that people using mobile
phones in private planes had experienced no problems:
"How do they know? They could affect people on
the ground and not know it."
A solution to the problem of airborne mobile phones
interfering with terrestrial mobile networks is the
use of an airplane-based base-station that would receive
and re-transmit mobile phone calls from the airplane
to the terrestrial networks. Companies such as AirCell
have developed technology that allows passengers to
use their mobile phones to make calls while flying.
AirCell plans to put small base stations on board commercial
aircraft. The base stations capture the signals from
passengers' own mobiles and retransmit them to specific
base stations on the ground. The beauty of the system
is that it prevents mobiles on board the plane from
swamping the cell systems on the ground, and also causes
the mobiles to transmit at their lowest power settings,
thus reducing the risk of interference with avionics.
The outlook for using mobiles on airplanes is not great
at the moment though. Aviation rules governing how commercial
aircraft operate allow airlines to ban the use of mobiles
at any time on an airplane, at their own discretion.
Airlines are unlikely to change their minds about use
of mobiles on an airplane when there is no evidence
that mobile phones do not have a detrimental effect
on avionics. Even if an airline were to change its mind
on the issue, insurers would prevent airlines from changing
policies governing the non-use of mobiles on flights.
The end result of this is that currently, the only place
that you will be able to use your mobile or see an airborne
base station technology such as AirCell's deployed is
on private and charter planes. So next time you jump
a Gulfstream or a Lear jet, be sure to leave your mobile
on.
Back
to News Reports
|